Tag Archive for 'psychology'

One Face of Loneliness

When we feel isolated, we perceive ourselves as doing all we can on behalf of our relationships, even when all objective evidence indicates otherwise. It is the lonely roommate who throws around snide comments all evening, and then when she meets resistance to the insults says, “You’re always criticizing me!” When this leads to an argument, she may be the one who starts to yell, requiring others to raise their voices ever so slightly as they try to reason with he. “Stop yelling at me!” is a not-unlikely response from someone whose social cognition perceives a world that is threatening on all sides, and whose ability to self-regular has been disrupted by those same perceptions.

The same sort of distortions can affect intimate relationships and persist for years. One partner in a relationship has a higher need for connection than the other currently fulfills—perhaps than the other can fulfill. Maybe this other partner is cold and narcissistic, but then again maybe his or her genes and life experience have simply provided a different (and lower) level of need. The point is not to assign “blame” to one or the other, but to recognize that there is a mismatch. Unfortunately, the partner who need is unmet may begin to act in ways that the other considers “difficult” or “too demanding” or “needy”, which causes him or her to pull away even further, leaving the partner who already feels lonely feeling even more neglected and isolated, which propels the patten spiraling downward toward greater unhappiness. Seeing this familiar dynamic through the lens of loneliness, and sometimes through the lens of genetically biased—and individually different—levels of need for connection, can allow us to address the problem and the search for solutions at a deeper level.

[...]

But even as dismal as this interpersonal dance may appear, the fact that loneliness makes us unwittingly contribute to the choreography is actually a plus. The same social cognition that amplifies the problem also gives us a point of access. The way we frame reality through the filter of our own thoughts is something that, with effort, we can learn to modify. The sense of threat we unconsciously rachet up is something we can learn to very consciously tone down.

Loneliness, John T. Cacioppo & William Patrick

categories: health, media, nature, quotes, science
spoke back

Currently Reading

Get the Books

categories: culture, nature, news, pictures, science
spoke back

Friday Leftovers

  • Catcalling: Creepy or Compliment? The CNN article describes the different responses women have to catcalling. Some find it complimentary; others, creepy. There are now blogs that tell stories of these encounters, such as Holla Back NYC. But the article doesn’t get to the heart of the problem: Why do women feel threatened or complimented when men whistle at them? We are already bombarded with messages that we need to be more beautiful, more available; having men reinforce those ideas—in a very rude fashion—can further the obsession over beauty.
  • Is it okay to lie? Teens speak up. Not surprisingly, teenagers are more likely to think it’s okay to lie to their parents than young children. Not going to tell who cleared out the liquor cabinet last Friday, are we?
  • Intoxicated people are less responsive to fear. This could be why people are more outgoing and daring when drunk; the amygdala, the part of the brain that detects threats, is impaired.
  • A Buddhist approach to eating. To temper overeating, psychologists recommend what is called mindful eating. Being aware of your body and recognising that hunger is a desire can remove the temptation of eating too much.
  • What Good Marketers Know. I’ve seen these ideas in many businesses. Now you can start applying them to blogging, too.
categories: culture, links, science
spoke back

Friday Leftovers

categories: health, links, media, news, politics, science
spoke back

Study Finds That Men Can’t Read Women

Study published in April’s issue of Psychological Science reveals that men interpret friendly camaraderie from women as sexual advances, but more interestingly, men also interpret actual sexual advances as friendly exchanges.

Just as in previous studies, men were more likely than women to misperceive friendliness as sexual interest, but they also were quite likely to misperceive sexual interest as friendliness. (link)

It’s not that men are more sexually interested than women so they misinterpret friendliness for sexual advances. They misinterpret sexual advances, too! Men, on average, just have trouble reading non-verbal clues from women.

I can’t say that I haven’t had that problem in my sexual relationships. I could be undressed, ready to go, on top of him, and holding a flashing neon banner, and still some men would just not get it.

Go figure.

categories: links, news, relationships, science
spoke back